This is really a practical question, which touches on Stefs personal freedom issues, something of which I am currently undergoing many inner battles to resolve in myself... But some of you may or may not be aware of the ID scheme that is currently in progress over here in the UK...
This ID scheme is perhaps the most ambitious scheme ever introduced throughout the world. It not only encompasses your photo, but also fingerrint and iris scan as well. The latter wouldn't be so bad if it wasn't for the central database that is being enacted along side it. This database would include as I recall around 30 pieces of information on each citizen. It would also be linked to many other government databases, such as welfare, revenues, drivers license and medical records amongst others. The government would sell access to this database to private industry on a need to know principle (whatever that is?).
The most pernicious thing regarding this ID card scheme is that it's being launched via the Passport office. This means that when you apply for a passport you are in fact applying for an ID card. Currently you can apply for a Passport until 2010 and refuse the ID card. However you will still go on the ID card database which is the very thing that most people distrust. Bear in mind that once you are on this database you are obliged by criminal law to tell the government of any changes to your circumstance, including where you live at the pain of a possible £5000 fine throughout your whole life. This means that come April 2015 my passport will expire and if I ever wish to travel abroad again, including the EU I will have to get one.
The interesting thing is, that the government has called this scheme 'voluntary'. Although that expression is highly dubious considering almost all health care and workers with children will be expected to have one, including airport staff, Police, army, fire and even students applying for loans to go to University. All foreigners that are staying in the country for longer than 3 months will be expected to have one, this will commence this November..
Now my question is, if I wish to have personal liberty and I mean the liberty that Stef talks of (personal inner liberty), not political etc. Should I take the steps to reject it outright and choose to take the governments option of a voluntary adoption? Bear in mind I could find myself finding it increasingly difficult to operate in the real world as indeed I am sure the government will ask banks and large corporations to enforce its need further into the future. Could my rejection of it have a far more detrimental impact on my personal liberty than if I were to be a part of it?