great article, but especially after last sunday's call in I was thinking, maybe the principle at play here is:
'attack the most rational, because you have most chance in convincing him'
It explains the criticism on Stef in the testing bridges thread, or why an organisation is attacked that is very close to our beliefs (skipping over others that are much more evil, but also much more irrational).
I think I act like that myself as well most of the time: it is not rational to attack the most irrational
That does not make it rational to attack the most rational either, but you search for something in between the Unarian cult and the most rational I guess. Any ideas ?
Violence has nothing with which to cover itself except the lie, and the
lie has nothing to stand on other than violence. Any man who has once
acclaimed violence as his method must inexorably choose the lie as his principle. Solzhenitsyn, Alexander